SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2742

SHIV SHANKER PRASAD
Kamal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Revisionist : Vikrant Rana.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.,Kumar Dhananjay.

JUDGMENT

Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the revisionist is taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. Vikrant Rana learned counsel for the revisionist, the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, and learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as perused the materials on record.

3. This criminal revision has been filed for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 30.09.2022 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge, Court No. 15, Meerut in Criminal Appeal No. 135 of 2017 (Kamal Kumar v. State of U.P. and Others) and impugned judgment and order dated 18.10.2017 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 5, Meerut in Complaint Case No. 654 of 2008 (Atul Rastogi v. M/s Maci Organics Limited and Others), under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

4. On 25.07.2023, the Court has passed following order:

    "Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Kumar Dhananjay, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

    This revision has been filed for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 30.09.2022 passed by learned Additional District and Session Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top