SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1826

VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
Rekha Verma – Appellant
Versus
Mithlesh Kumari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Vidya Kant Shukla.
For the Respondent: Rahul Sahai.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.

Heard Sri. Vidya Kant Shukla, learned counsel for appellants, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 Insurance Company and perused the record. No one is present on behalf of respondent nos.1 & 3.

2. This first appeal from order has been filed by the appellants-claimants for enhancement of compensation against the judgment and award dated 16.11.2015 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.5/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kanpur Nagar in M.A.C.P. No.422 of 2013 (Smt. Rekha Verma and another v. Smt. Mithlesh Kumari and others), by which compensation of Rs. 2,62,000/- along with 7% interest has been awarded in favour of appellants-claimants and the entire liability has been fixed upon the respondent no.2 Insurance Company.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that claimants had fully proved that the deceased was engaged as Mason (Rajmistri) and had earned Rs. 300/- per day. The claimant-appellant no.1, who is wife of deceased was appeared as P.W.-1 before the Claims Tribunal and has stated in her statement that her husband was a Mason having income of Rs. 300/- per day and the Claims Tribunal has erred in disbeli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top