VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
R. M. S. Jayas – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.
Heard Sri. Archit Mehrotra, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri. Ankur Goyal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of claimant-respondent nos. 1 to 3 and perused the record. No one is present on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5.
2. This first appeal from order has been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company against the judgement and award dated 07.12.2013 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.-15/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Agra in M.A.C.P. No. 921 of 2007(Sri. R.M.S. Jayas and others v. Sri. Yashpal Singh and others) by which compensation of Rs. 17,31,378.74/- paisa along with 07% interest has been awarded in favour of claimants-respondents on account of death of Abhishek Jayas aged about 23 years.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that it was a case of head on collision in between Honda Activa Scooter and Maruti Van and as such drivers of both the vehicles were equally negligent and responsible for the accident. The claims tribunal has erred in deciding issue no.1 holding rash and negligent driving of driver of Maruti Van and nothing has been deducted in terms of contributory negligence of the scooterist. It is
The court upheld the claims tribunal's findings on negligence and compensation, affirming that composite negligence allows claims against multiple parties and that future potential income of a deceas....
The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision on contributory negligence and confirmed the compensation awarded for the loss of life, applying proper legal standards regarding income assessment and futu....
The court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation for a fatal motorcycle accident, affirming findings of negligence and the calculation method used for compensation.
In cases of composite negligence, a claimant can recover full compensation from any joint tortfeasor, regardless of the degree of negligence attributed to each party.
Family mainly the widow would as per the rules will receive a sum, which will aggregate to upto 2025 Rs. 67,28,256/- for a period of 12 years which will not permit us to disturb the findings as far n....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of negligence, contributory negligence, and composite negligence principles in motor accident cases, and the need for new strategie....
The judgment established the principles of negligence, contributory negligence, and composite negligence in motor accident cases, and applied relevant legal provisions and precedents to determine com....
The court affirmed that compensation should account for future prospects with a 50% addition for a permanent employee and rejected claims of contributory negligence due to insufficient evidence.
The court established that the absence of evidence for contributory negligence justified the Tribunal's compensation award.
Section 140 of M.V. Act is read as liability to pay compensation in certain cases on principle of no fault.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.