SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1821

VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
Radhika Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Gupta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Anju Shukla, Nigamendra Shukla
For the Respondent: Ajay Singh

JUDGMENT

Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.

Heard Sri. Nigmendra Shukla, learned counsel for claimantsappellants and Sri. Ajay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2-Insurance Company. No one is present for respondent no.1. Perused the record.

2. This FAFO has been filed by the appellants for enhancement of compensation against the judgment and award dated 14.1.2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.5, Bulandshahr in MACP No. 85 of 2003(Km. Radhika Singh and others v. Rajeev Gupta and another), by which compensation of Rs. 50,000/- alongwith 7% interest has been awarded in favour of claimants-appellants.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that very meagre amount of compensation has been awarded by the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal has awarded only Rs. 50,000/- on the ground that claimant no. 1 is married daughter of the deceased and claimant no.2 is major son of the deceased and they are not entitled for any compensation. It is further submitted that admittedly, the claimant no.1 Radhika Singh was unmarried at the time of death of her mother in the road accident and the Claims Tribunal has committed gross illegality in awarding only Rs. 50,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top