SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2125

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Bhagwan Bux Singh – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue U. P. Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Krishna Mohan.
For the Respondents: S.C. and D.S. Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.)

Heard Mr. Rohit Verma, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Krishna Mohan, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Jai Raj, learned counsel for the contesting respondents.

2. In the present case land in dispute was acquisition of one Balidan Singh, which was later on inherited by one Sheodin Singh, who died issueless in the year 1965. The respondent No. 4 set up a case that he was son of Sheodin Singh's sister and further claimed that such Sheodin Singh has executed a Will deed on 23.7.1957 in his favour as well as on ground of inheritance also.

3. The respondent No. 4 on the basis of said Will deed instituted a suit under Section 229B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, claiming Sirdhari and Bhumidhari rights on part of land in dispute. The Suit was contested by the petitioner that said Balidan Singh has only one daughter namely Sheo Kala and Sheodin Singh was not empowered to execute Will in regard to land in dispute.

4. The Assistant Collector Ist-Class Rai-Bareilly, framed eight issues, including the issue No. 2 i.e. (Did Sheodin Singh execute Will deed in favour of the plaintiff? If so, is it valid?

5. The learned Trial Court decided the said issue, that the Wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top