Back
RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Atul Kumar Singh @ Atul Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.)
Heard Sri Vishwajeet Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Kaustubh Singh, Sri Pankaj Singh, Sri Suryansh Singh and Sri Dileep Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and Sri V.K. Shahi, learned Additional Advocate General of U.P. assisted by Sri Anurag Verma, A.G.A.-I and Sri Ajeet Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following relief :
Or,
to pass any order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and
The jurisdiction for trial of an offence is determined by where the offence was committed, as per Section 177 Cr.P.C., and the court must ensure that proceedings are not an abuse of process.
The evidence produced by the accused in his defense cannot be looked into by the court at the pre-trial stage. The court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings is to prevent ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a prima facie case to be made out against the accused and the limitations on the court's power to appreciate evidence at the pr....
Power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. at pre-trial stage should not be used in a routine manner, but it has to be used sparingly, only in such an appropriate cases, where it manifestly appears that there i....
Point of law : Needless to point out that if the law provides a particular remedy to an accused, then it is always open for him to exhaust the same while approaching the concerned Court while filing ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
