SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2109

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Arshad Husain – Appellant
Versus
Shahneela Nishat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shafiq Mirza, Ali Akhtar Zaidi
For the Respondent: Mohd. Mustafizul Haq

Judgement Key Points

Case Summary

Parties and Proceedings: Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 by husband (Arshad Husain) against dismissal of Declaration Case No. 214 of 2019 by Family Court, Lucknow, seeking declaration of matrimonial status post-alleged triple talaq. Marriage solemnized on 12.1.2002. (!) (!) (!)

Family Court Findings: Case dismissed at admission stage for lack of evidence on triple talaq (no proof of pronouncements during non-menstrual periods or prior reconciliation efforts). (!) (!)

Mutual Agreement (Mubara'at): Parties entered voluntary mutual divorce agreement dated 15.6.2024, filed in related Section 125 Cr.P.C. proceedings. Husband paid Rs. 30,00,000/- in full to wife in three installments; both parties to withdraw all cases; marriage to dissolve by consent. Both counsels confirmed agreement, payment, and consent during appeal hearing. (!) (!) (!)

Legal Principles on Divorce under Muslim Personal Law: - Governed by Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (Section 2), recognizing forms like Mubara'at (mutual consent divorce). (!) - Mubara'at allows dissolution by mutual agreement without judicial intervention, effective upon clear consent of both spouses; does not impact maintenance obligations per agreement. (!) - Court verifies only mutuality and voluntariness; if satisfied, endorses dissolution and declares parties "divorced" without further inquiry. (!)

Court's Decision: Appeal allowed; Family Court order set aside. Decree of divorce granted in terms of Mubara'at dated 15.6.2024; matrimonial status declared "divorced". No remand needed as facts undisputed and parties separated. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

Ratio: Mutual consent divorce under Muslim Personal Law (Mubara'at) is valid upon verification of voluntary agreement; court limited to endorsement if consent confirmed.


JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Ali Akhtar Zaidi, learned Counsel representing the appellant/husband and Shri Mohd. Mustafizul Haq, learned Counsel representing the respondent/wife.

2. This appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed by the husband/appellant, seeking to quash the judgment and order dated 4.7.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow, whereby Declaration Case No. 214 of 2019 filed by the husband/appellant for declaration of matrimonial status of the parties has been dismissed at the admission stage.

3. Facts of the case are that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 12.1.2002 in accordance with Islamic Rites and Rituals. It was the case of the appellant that after marriage, the behaviour of his wife was not good as his wife was having affair with a police officer, on account of which his wife visited her parental house frequently. With the connivance of the said police officer, his wife had lodged frivolous complaint against him and her behaviour became cruel. Ultimately, on 2.7.2018, she went to parental home and since then, she is living there only. Despite efforts made by him for reconcilia

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top