Consent of a minor is invalid in sexual offences, establishing that enticement and sexual acts against minors constitute serious crimes, particularly under IPC and scheduled caste legislation.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.

1. The instant Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the accused appellant against judgment and order dated 29.04.2011 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Mirzapur in S.T. No.146 of 2008 State Vs. Raju Musalman, arising out of Case Crime No.111 of 2008 under Sections 363 , 366, 376 of IPC, Section 3(1)12 of SC/ST Act, Police Station Lalganj, District Mirzapur. By the impugned judgment and order learned Special Judge convicted the appellant/accused for charge under Section 363 , 366 and 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(12) of SC/ ST (PA) Act and sentenced him to five years rigorous imprisonment alongwith file of Rs.500 for charge under Section 363 IPC, seven years rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- for charge under Section 366 IPC, ten years rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.2,000/- for charge under Section 376 IPC and one year rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- for charge section 3(1)(12) of SC/ST Act the sentence and fine is coupled with default stipulation.

2. Heard Sri Indrajeet Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Yogendra Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that accused has already been released from jail custody after serving out the sentence awarded in the impugned judgment.

4. The factual matrix of the case in brief are that FIR in the present case was lodged at the instance of Ram Narain on 27.02.2008 at 18:45 hours on the basis of written report produced by him before Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur dated 18.02.2008 stating that he belonged to Schedule Caste (Dharikar), his sister aged about 13 years was studying in Class VIIth. She went to school on 29.11.2007 and got missing from the school. He made search of her and on 01.12.2007, he came to know in the village Dighuli, Police Station Lalganj, District Mirzapur that Raju Musalmaan son of Bhagnu Musalmaan (muslim by caste) has enticed away his minor sister and took her to his home and stayed with her overnight there, and thereafter he escaped from his place alongwith victim girl. The whole family of Raju Musalmaan was hand in grove with Raju in kidnapping of his minor sister. Father of informant filed written information in this regard on 01.12.2007 and 15.12.2007 at Police Station Lalganj as well as Reporting Chowki (OP) Baraundha, but the report was not lodged; his daughter took away Rs.10,000 cash and ornaments of her mother alongwith her. The accused Raju Musalmaan has confined her minor daughter in his home. The FIR was lodged under Section 363 , 366 and 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(12) of SC/ST (PA) Act, at Police Station concerned.

5. Sri R.V.Rai, Circle Officer PW7 who has conducted the investigation of the case. According to the statement of the witnesses the victim was recovered after after lodging of FIR. The Investigating Officer collected school leaving certificate of the victim of Class Vth in which her aged is mentioned as 10.03.1995. She left school on 30.06.2005 after clearance of Class Vth examination and same date of birth was mentioned in the scholar register also. Thus, according to her date of birth mentioned in academic record she was found to be aged about 12 years 8 months and 9 days on the date of incident. The victim escaped from the house of the accused after 2 to 2 ½ months of kidnapping. The Investigating Officer recorded her statement under Section 161