SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2237

YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Master Mahib Sajjad Masood – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Om Prakash Mishra, R.P.S. Chauhan
For the Respondent: G.A., R P Rajan

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Sri Abhishek, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Om Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A.-I appearing for the State-respondents and Sri R. P. Rajan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 8, 9, 10 and 11.

2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed primarily seeking the following relief:-

    "1. a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding all the respondent authorities as well as private respondents to produce Master Mahib Sajjad Masood the corpus before this Hon'ble Court to set at liberty forthwith and to give custody to his natural guardian - father (petitioner no.2) to secure his future."

3. Pursuant to the rule nisi issued earlier, the petitioner No. 1 (corpus), minor child of age about seven years, has been produced in Court by respondent No. 8, his mother.

4. Respondent No. 8 is present in Court and has been identified by her counsel, Sri R. P. Rajan.

5. The petitioner No. 2, Sajjad Hasan Masood, father of the petitioner no.1 (corpus), is also present in Court, and has been identified by his counsel, Sri Abhishek, learned Advoca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top