YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Master Mahib Sajjad Masood – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Abhishek, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Om Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A.-I appearing for the State-respondents and Sri R.P. Rajan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 8, 9, 10 and 11.
2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed primarily seeking the following relief:-
3. Pursuant to the rule nisi issued earlier, the petitioner No. 1 (corpus), minor child of age about seven years, has been produced in Court by respondent No. 8, his mother.
4. Respondent No. 8 is present in Court and has been identified by her counsel, Sri R. P. Rajan.
5. The petitioner No. 2, Sajjad Hasan Masood, father of the petitioner no.1 (corpus), is also present in Court, and has been identified by his counsel, Sri Abhishek, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Om Prakash Mishra.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.