SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, JAYANT BANERJI, JJ.
Akhilesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Allahabad Central University, Through Its Registrar And 2 Others - Respondents
Special Appeal No.117 of 2024
Decided on : 26-04-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amar Sukh Rai,Kapil Dev Yadav
For the Respondent: Diptiman Singh, Gopal Das Srivastava

The court upheld the cancellation of admission based on the petitioner's failure to meet the eligibility criteria, affirming that procedural fairness was maintained despite the lack of a formal order from the Principal.

Headnote:(A) Allahabad University Admission Rules 2022 - Clause 1.4.1(d) - Cancellation of admission - The petitioner applied for admission to MA Political Science but was denied due to a score below the cut-off of 70 marks, as per the university's admission criteria. The cancellation was communicated without a formal order from the Principal, raising concerns about procedural fairness. However, the court found that the petitioner was ineligible based on the established criteria and that the cancellation was justified. (Paras 6, 14, 22, 23, 29)

(B) Natural Justice - The argument that the petitioner was denied an opportunity to be heard was dismissed, as the court concluded that no hearing could change the petitioner's score, rendering the opportunity illusory. (Paras 23, 24)

(C) Authority for Cancellation - The court noted that the cancellation was based on a committee's recommendation and did not require a separate order from the Principal, as the Principal was aware of the committee's findings. (Paras 26, 28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for admission on 30.09.2023, received provisional admission, but was later informed on 05.12.2023 that his admission was cancelled due to not meeting the cut-off score.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the cancellation of admission, affirming that the petitioner did not meet the eligibility criteria and that the process followed was not unfair.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the cancellation process and whether the petitioner was afforded a fair opportunity to contest the decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner’s low score justified the cancellation of admission, and procedural fairness was not violated as the necessary information was accessible online.

Result: Special Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Amar Sukh Rai, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Diptiman Singh appearing for respondent No.1 and Shri H.R. Mishra who appears for respondent no. 2 and 3.

2. The instant special Appeal is directed against the order dated 03.01.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ C No. 42952 of 2023 whereby the writ petition was dismissed.

3. The facts of the case briefly stated are that the petitioner-appellant applied for admission in MA political science in Shyama Prasad Mukharjee State Degree College in non-subject category on 30.09.2023.

4. The petitioner was granted provisional admission and was allotted a roll number. He also appeared for the viva-voce held prior to the written examinations stated to commence from 11.11.2023. However, on 05.12.2023, it was communicated to the petitioner that his admission stood cancelled. The letter dated 05.12.2023, addressed to the petitioner was by the Convenor, Political Science Department of the Shyama Prasad Mukharjee Degree College.

5. The contention of Amar Sukh Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner is that the actual order cancelling his admission has not been provided to him and that on the communication of such an order made to the petitioner. In any case the order cancelling the admission of the petitioner has been passed without any notice/information and without affording any opportunity to show cause. The petitioner has, therefore, been condemned without an opportunity of hearing. There is no allegation of fraud against the petitioner.

6. The reason given in the communication is that the petitioner was not eligible for admission as per the Allahabad University Rules pertaining to Admission 2022 and Clause 1.4.1(d) because the merit of the petitioner as per TGAT was only 26.25 which is lower than the cut-off which was 70. The petitioner would be eligible for admission only if he had more than 70 marks.

7. The communication dated 05.12.2023 also stated that admission fees deposited could be collected by him and as also the original certificates furnished by him.

8. No such cut-off, the basis for cancelling the admission of the petitioner, finds a mention in the online form filled by the petitioner.

9. Moreover, there exists no order of the Principal, the competent authority, who alone could have cancelled the admission of the petitioner. Besides, the report of the five member Committee constituted by the Principal to examine the admission in Political Science Department which has been filed on record states that there was negligence and ignorance on the part of the Admission Committee of Political Science. The petitioner has, therefore, been penalized for the fault of others.

9. Shri Diptiman Singh appearing for the first respondent, the Registrar University of Allahabad, has produced before this Court the screenshots of the online application form to show that once an application form is being filled the brochure is available online as is clear from the screen shots. The relevant brochure, in the case of the petitioner was with regard to PGAT and in the screenshot, the same is shown PGAT(PDFs/PGAT%202023.pdf). A print out of this Pdf has been produced for the perusal of the Court. Various clauses of the Brochure which are enumerated below, have been specifically referred to by Shri Diptiman Singh:-

    (i). On page 3 of the Brochure, it is provided that admission to MA, Political Science, was permitted for Non-Subject Candidates.

    (ii). On page 6 of the brochure is the information with regard to Non-Subject Candidates which apart from other things, which provides:-

    “The merit of such Non-Subject Candidate will be computed on the basis of average of their scores in the respective two PGAT-2023 tests for which he/she is a Subject Candidate.”

    (iii). On page 17 of the brochure is clause 1.2.2 which reads as follows:-

    “The candidature of a candidate (and the admission granted on that basis) shall stand cancelled at any stage in case the candidate is found to be inelligib

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top