SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1749

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ramesh Sinha, Vivek Varma, JJ.
Shiv Pratap Singh & Others – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. - 387 of 1985
Decided On : 13-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.K. Singh, Anurag Kumar Singh, Ghanshyam Tripathi, M L Syal, M.L. Syal, Shashi Kiran Arya, Shishir Pradhan
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323 - Six accused persons tried for murder, unlawful assembly, and related offences. IV Additional Sessions Judge convicted four accused under Sections 302/149 IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment, along with additional sentences for other charges. Appellant Vijay Vikram Singh and Nanhey, surviving in appeal, argued against their convictions citing lack of evidence linking them to fatal injuries. Court affirmed lower court's finding, emphasizing eyewitness testimonies, medical reports substantiating fatal injuries, and established motive from past animosities. (Paras 2, 24, 30, 36, 42)

Facts of the case:
The incident occurred on 28.10.1983 when the informant, along with his deceased brother, was attacked by the accused while returning from a cold storage facility after collecting seed potatoes. The deceased sustained fatal injuries from sharp-edged weapons, dying at the scene. (Paras 5, 31)

Findings of Court:
Convictions affirmed as eyewitness accounts were credible and corroborated by medical evidence attributing cause of death to multiple incised wounds. Court maintained that minor contradictions do not impact the overall reliability of witness testimonies. (Paras 36, 41)

Issues: The main issues addressed included whether the appellants were correctly identified as perpetrators and whether the evidence supported the claims of unlawful assembly and intent to kill. (Paras 28, 22)

Ratio Decidendi: The court justified its decision on the reliability of injured witnesses alongside consistent medical reports, stating that the presence of the informant at the scene provided a strong foundation for the prosecution, countering claims of false implication due to familial ties in prior cases. (Paras 40, 44)

Result: Appeal dismissed; the convictions upheld.

JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Sinha, J.

INTRODUCTION

1. Six accused persons, namely, Shiv Pratap Singh, Vijay Vikram Singh, Kali Charan, Nanhey, Ram Autar and Jaskaran were tried by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi in Sessions Trial No.314 of 1984 : State Vs. Shiv Pratap Singh and others arising out of Case Crime No.188 of 1983, under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 302 I.P.C. at police station Bilgram, District Hardoi.

2. Vide judgment and order dated 07.06.1985, the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi, while acquitting the accused Jaskaran from all the offences/charges levelled against him, convicted and sentenced the rest of the accused persons, namely, Shiv Pratap Singh, Vijay Vikram Singh, Ram Autar, Kalicharan and Nanhey in the manner as stated herein below:-

    “i. Under Sections 302/149 I.P.C. to undergo life imprisonment; and

    ii. Under Section 323 /149 I.P.C. to undergo six months R.I.”

In addition, the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi had also convicted the accused Shiv Pratap Singh, Nanhey Lal and Ram Autar under Section 148 I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo one year’s imprisonment and other two accused persons, namely, Vijay Vikram Singh and Kali Charan were convicted under Section 147 I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo six months’ R.I.

All the sentences were directed to run concurrently by the IV Additional Sessions Judge.

3. During pendency of the instant appeal, appellant no.1-Shiv Pratap Singh, appellant no.3-Kalicharan and appellant no.5- Ram Autar died and, as such, vide order dated 13.08.2018, the instant appeal filed against the aforesaid appellants no.1, 3 and 5 stand abated.

4. Now, the instant appeal is surviving only in respect of appellant no.2-Vijay Vikram Singh and appellant no.4- Nanhey, who are said to be in jail since 08.07.2019.

FACT

5. Shorn off, unnecessary details the facts of the case are as under :-

On 28.10.1983, informant-Lal Bahadur Singh (PW1) and his elder brother Vijay Bahadur Singh Pradhan (deceased) had gone to Cold Store, Bilgram for taking the seed of potato and after taking it, they were returning home on their respective bicycle and when they reached near the Sorghum (Jowar) farm of one Kunwar Pal of Chakarpurwa at about 4 p.m. in the evening, accused/appellant no.1-Shiv Pratap Singh armed with Kanta and his son accused/ appellant no.2-Vijay Vikram Singh armed with Lathi challenged them (informant and his brother Vijay Bahadur Singh Pradhan) and said that ^^?ksj dj ekj Mkyks nq'eu vkt tkus u ik,** . Thereupon, appellant no.3- Kalicharan armed with lathi, appellant no.4-Nanhey armed with Banka, appellant no.5-Ram Autar armed with Kanta and other two other persons armed with lathi, to whom identified by him by their face but not by name, came out from Sorgum (Jowar) field and started assaulting the brother of the informant Vijay Bahadur Singh (deceased). Thereafter, informant-Lal Bahadur Singh (P.W.1) and his brother Vijay Bahadur Singh (deceased) raised alarm and on hearing their alarm, Raj Kumar, son of Hardayal and Vishwanath Singh son of Thakur Bux Singh, r/o Kuluwapur, who were ploughing their field nearby and one Ram Saroop Singh (P.W.2), son of Ujagar Singh, who was going towards his home from Bilgram, came at the place of occurrence and they all asked the accused persons not to assault Vijay Bahadur Singh (deceased) and also challenged them. Thereafter, appellant No.3-Kalicharan started assaulting the informant- Lal Bahadur Singh (P.W.1) with lathi, as a consequence of which, he also sustained injuries on his left hand wrist, elbow and arm and on right leg.

It has also been stated in the F.I.R. by the informant-Lal Bahadur Singh (P.W.1) that about five years ago from the date of the incident, his aunt Smt. Bittan Devi, who is the samdhin of appellant no.1-Shiv Pratap Singh and mother-in-law of appellant no. 2-Vijay Vikram Singh, was murdered, in which his brother Vijay Bahadur Singh (deceased) was named as accused but was later on acquitted by the competent Court. On account of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top