SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2309

SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Angus Stanly – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Aakash Sharma, Himanshu Pandey, Manju Singh, Mary Puncha (Sheeb Jose), Mohd. Kalim, Sahibe Alam

JUDGMENT :

Saurabh Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Ms. Sheeb Jose, Sri Mohd. Kalim and Mrs. Manju Singh, all learned counsels for applicant and Sri P.C.Srivastava, learned AAG assisted by Sri C.L. Chaudhary, learned AGA and Sri Amit Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

2. By means of the instant bail application, applicant is seeking bail in Case Crime No. 14 of 2022, under Section 420 IPC & Section 66C of Information Technology Act & Section 14-B Foreigners Act, Police Station-Cyber Crime, District-Prayagraj during pendency of trial.

3. Learned counsels for the applicant appeared in this matter but leading arguments have been raised by Ms. Sheeb Jose and at the very outset, it has been informed by her that the applicant has not been named in the FIR as well as no strict evidence has been appended or produced by the prosecution against the applicant for implicating in the instant Case Crime no. 14 of 2022 under Section 420 IPC & Section 66C of Information Technology Act & Section 14-B Foreigners Act.

4. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is languishing in jail since 21.07.2022 and till today no prosecution witness has been properl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top