SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2267

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.
Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32429 of 2023
Decided On : 03-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : D.K. Ojha, Dinesh Chandra Dwivedi, Gaurav Kakkar, Rajesh Kumar Tripathi

To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of instigation or encouragement by the accused is required, which was absent in this case.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306 and 506 - Bail application - Accused sought bail in a case involving allegations of abetment of suicide and threats - Prosecution alleged that the accused blackmailed the deceased, leading to her suicide - Court found no evidence of instigation or abetment by the accused, emphasizing that essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 IPC were missing - The court noted that the suicide notes were not credible and the prosecution failed to establish a direct link between the accused's actions and the suicides. (Paras 6, 8, 18, 20)

(B) Bail - Grant of bail - The court held that considering the nature of allegations and lack of evidence, the applicant was entitled to bail, subject to conditions. (Paras 20, 21)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was accused of abetting the suicides of his cousin Pooja and her husband Ramsagar, with allegations of blackmail and threats related to an obscene video. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that he was falsely implicated due to family disputes.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the prosecution did not provide sufficient evidence to establish the charges against the applicant, leading to the conclusion that he was entitled to bail.

Issues: The main issues included whether the applicant abetted the suicides and whether the prosecution met the burden of proof required under Section 306 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without clear evidence of instigation or abetment, the charges under Section 306 IPC could not be sustained.

Result: Bail application allowed.

JUDGMENT :

SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.

1. Learned AGA has filed counter affidavit today.

2. Supplementary affidavit and rejoinder affidavit has also been filed on behalf of applicant today. Let the same be taken on record.

3. Heard Mr. Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

4. By means of this application, the applicant is seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 874 of 2017, under Sections 306 and 506 IPC, Police Station Meja, District Prayagraj.

5. Prosecution story is that the informant Ganga Ram Nishad has lodged the impugned FIR on 27.12.2017 alleging therein that his son Ramsagar was married to Puja, daughter of Ram Bhajan on 5th June, 2017. Accused Deepu son of Umesh Chandra Nishad alias Kallu Nipad was having illicit relation with his daughter-in-law Puja even before marriage and even after marriage, accused Deepu used to visit the matrimonial house of Pooja and was being tried to made physical relation with her at her matrimonial house and when Puja refused to do so, accused Deepu threatened her stating therein that he had made her sex video and would be viral on internet and Whatsapp. On the basis of that obscene video, accused Deepu used blackmailing Puja, who fed up with this act, has committed suicide on 12.09.2017 by hanging and before hanging, she herself written a suicide note, which was shown by the informant to Deepu’s mother, who took it to her house and when the informant asked to return it, she refused and started blackmailing his son Ramsagar by showing him the sex video and started demanding Rs. 5,00,000/- (five lakh rupees). Enraged by this act, the informant son Ramsagar also wrote a suicide note against Deepu and his mother Urmila Devi alias Semrahia and hanged himself on 18.12.2017 in the same room. As per suicide note, the reason for the death of his daughter-in-law Pooja and his son Ramsagar is against accused Deepu and his mother. It is further alleged that the alleged suicide note written by the informant’s son before committing suicide is a photocopy of the suicide note. It is further alleged that the accused persons are continuously threatening to kill the informant and his family.

6. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is the maternal cousin of the deceased Pooja and when she was killed by her in-laws, the applicant was doing pairvi for registration of FIR against the informant, who is father-in-law of the deceased Pooja, due to this reason, the applicant has been implicated. The applicant has never committed any offence as alleged in the impugned FIR even the applicant has no concern with the alleged incident. It is a case of matrimonial death on account of matrimonial dispute between husband and wife, first, wife thereafter, her husband has committed suicide. Further submission is that the deceased Pooja was married with the son of informant, namely, Ram Sagar on 05.06.2017 and when deceased Pooja went to her matrimonial house, her in-laws including husband subjected her with cruelty in lieu of demand of dowry such as motorcycle and Rs. 50,000/- cash and when their demands were not fulfilled, they have killed the deceased Pooja on 12.09.2017, thereafter, father of the deceased lodged FIR against the in-laws i.e. husband Ram Sagar, father-in-law Gangaram (the present informant) and mother-in-law Gangadei on 13.09.2017 under Sections 498A, 304B and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. As per postmortem report of the deceased Pooja, ligature mark as well as contusion 12cm X 6cm has been found on the skull of the deceased and cause of death has been mentioned as Asphyxia due to ante-mortem hanging. Further submission is that after three months of the death of deceased Pooja, her husband Ram Sagar has also committed suicide on 18.12.2017, thereafter, the impugned FIR has been lodged against the applicant and his mother Urmila Devi. As

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top