SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2275

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
Umashankar Patel – Petitioner
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. - 2420 of 2023
Decided On : 08-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shivam Singh
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, Shashi Shekhar Mishra

Public Interest Litigations must serve the public interest and cannot be used for personal grievances, as established in this case.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 - Section 67 - Public Interest Litigation - Encroachment on Gaon Sabha land - Petitioner sought removal of encroachments over specific plots recorded as 'Nali Nalkooop' - Respondents contended that the petitioner himself encroached the plots, thus questioning the legitimacy of the PIL - Court found no rebuttal to the claims made by the respondents regarding the petitioner's encroachment - Dismissed the PIL. (Paras 2, 6, 13, 14)

(B) Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Scope of Public Interest Litigation - Court emphasized that PILs should not be used for personal grievances and must serve the public interest. (Paras 13)

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Heard Sri Shivam Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shashi Shekhar Mishra, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 6 to 10, Sri Dilip Kumar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 Gaon Sabha.

2. The instant Public Interest Litigation has been filed for the following relief:-

    "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by the respondent Nos. 6 to 10 over the Arazi No. 962 area 0.1380 Hectare and Arazi No. 1009 area 0.0890 Hectare of Gaon Sabha land of Village Hathera, Pargana & Tehsil Madiyahu, District Jaunpur recorded as " Nali Nalkooop" in the revenue records and further to get restored on its original shape.

    B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 and 3 to take necessary action on the application/representation of the petitioner/villagers dated 21.07.2023".

3. This Court has directed the learned Standing Counsel to obtain instructions in the matter. Accordingly, the instructions have been placed before this Court which is already on record. Private respondent Nos. 6 to 10 have also filed their counter affidavit. Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha has also placed the instructions dated 04.02.2024 before this Court, which is taken on record.

4. Counsel for the petitioner states that there is no need to file rejoinder affidavit or reply to the facts as mentioned in the instructions filed by the State/Gaon Sabha.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that plot No. 962 and 1009 are recorded as class 6-1 category plot (Nali Nalkoop) in the revenue record, as such the authority be directed to remove the encroachment made by respondent Nos. 6 to 10 over the plot Nos. 962 and 1009. He further submitted that application has been filed before the authority concerned for removal of the encroachment, but no steps have been taken against private respondent Nos. 6 to 10.

6. Sri Shashi Shekhar Mishra, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 6 to 10 submitted that instant Public Interest Litigation has not been filed in the public interest rather it has been preferred to harass the private respondents. He further submitted that the petitioner himself encroached the plots in question, as such the instant Public Interest Litigation cannot be entertained. He further placed the copy of the application/complaint made by the private respondents, in order to demonstrate that the petitioner has encroached the plot in question.

7. Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha placed the instructions sent by Gram Pradhan of the village annexing the spot map as well as village map in order to demonstrate that the petitioner has encroached the plots in question resulting into stoppage of the interlocking work in the village in question. He further submitted that the petitioner has filed instant petition for his personal interest as such, the instant Public Interest Litigation is liable to be dismissed with costs against the petitioner.

8. Sri Dilip Kumar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel has also submitted that against the encroachment, which has been found in respect to plot in question, the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 has been registered as Case No. T202314360605971 Gaon Sabha vs. Raghuraj Bahadur and others. He further submitted that for the flow of water, the underground pipeline has already been set-up in the plots in question which has been reserved for Nali Nalkoop Khata, as such no further action is required in the matter.

9. I have considered the argument advanced by the parties and perused the record.

10. There is no dispute about about the fact that plots in question are reserved as class 6-1 category plot.

11. The instructions sent by the Sub Divisional Officer Mariyahu, District

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top