JUDGMENT :

Jaspreet Singh, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 has been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel.

2. Under challenge is the order dated 02.08.2024 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sitapur whereby the order passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation dated 23.02.2024 and 16.11.2022 passed by the Consolidation Officer has been affirmed.

3. Assailing the aforesaid three orders, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the three Consolidation Authorities have committed a patent illegality in ignoring the impact of the judgment passed in favour of the predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioner namely Ram Bharose and the reason given by the Consolidation Courts that there was a registered sale deed in favour of Sri Sazzad Hussain, the predecessors-in-interest of the private respondent no. 4 to 8 dated 24.01.1981 which could not be ignored and since as per the said sale deeds, the rights were with Sazzad Hussain (thereafter on his successors). The three Authorities have erred in relying upon the same whereas the said sale deed as per the petitioner had been d