SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(All) 11

RAFIQUE
Dukhi – Appellant
Versus
Dhanni Missir – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rafique, J. - This is an application in revision from a decree of the Small Cause Court Judge of Deoria. It appears that the plaintiff opposite party sued the applicants for the recovery of Re. 50 on the allegation that they had unlawfully cut down the trees belonging to the plaintiff opposite party. The claim was resisted on various grounds and the title of the plaintiff opposite party was denied. It was further objected that the suit was not maintainable in the Court of the Judge of Small Causes. The learned Judge, however, disallowing all the pleas for the defence decreed the claim for Rs. 5. In revision it is urged, that Article 35, Clauses (i), (ii) of the Schedule to the Small Cause Courts Act prohibits the entertainment of such a suit by a Judge of the Small Cause Court. The Clause relied upon is as follows:

For an act which is, or, save for the provisions of Chapter IV of the Indian Penal Code, would, be, an offence punishable under Chapter XVII of the said Code.

2. The cutting down of trees belonging to other persons and misappropriating them is an offence against property punishable under Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code. the claim was, therefore, not maintaina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top