SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 274

RAM BILAS KEDAR NATH – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax OFFICER, DISTRICT III (I), KANPUR,. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This is a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution directed against the notices issued u/s 22(4), section 28(1)(a) and section 46(5A) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The prayer is for the quashing of the aforesaid notices issued in respect of the assessment proceedings for 1953-54 and 1954-55. A prayer is also made for the issue of a writ of mandamus requiring the Income Tax Officer not to assess the firm, Messrs. Ram Bilas Kedar Nath, for the assessment years 1953-54 and 1954-55.

The petition is supported by an affidavit which makes allegations against the Income Tax officer of harassment. No counter-affidavit was field and, therefore, the allegations made in the petition must be taken to be true. The only point urged by the learned standing counsel is, what he calls a legal point for which no counter-affidavit was necessary, and that is that a writ of mandamus can never issue so long as the Income Tax officer had jurisdiction to make the assessment. According to him there is no period of limitation at all in respect of an assessment made u/s 23 of the Act to which the provisions of section 28(1)(c) could be made applicable. In other w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top