BRIJLAL GUPTA, OAK
Singhara Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Oak, J. - These three connected appeals relate to the murder of one Raja Ram. Singhara Singh has been convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor u/s 302, I.P.C. Bir Singh and Tega Singh have been convicted u/s 302, IPC read with Ss. 120B, 109 and 114, IPC. Singhara Singh and Bir Singh have been sentenced to death; while Tega Singh has been sentenced to imprisonment for life.
2. According to the prosecution, Raja Ram deceased was a businessman of Afzalgarh in district Bijnor. He had a shop in the main market of Afzalgarh. For a long time Abdul Rashid accused had enmity with Raja Ram. Zamir and Khalil accused are related to Abdul Rashid accused. These men decided to get Raja Ram murdered. The three man secured the services of four Sikhs for murdering Raja Ram. The four Sikhs are Kundan Singh, Singhara Singh, Bir Singh and Tega Singh. The seven men entered into a criminal conspiracy to murder Raja Ram.
3. One evening Raja Ram was sitting at his shop. The four Sikh accused visited the shop at about 7-30 p.m. Three accused stood near the shop; while the fourth accused stood at a short distance from the shop. The three Sikh accused made some purchases from Raja Ram
Asharfi and Another Vs. The State
Shrinivas Krishnarao Kango Vs. Narayan Devji Kango and Others
Dass Bank Ltd. Vs. Smt. Kali Kumari Debi and Another
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and Another Vs. The State of Vindhya Pradesh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.