Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RYVES, J.
Emperor - Appellant
Versus
Ram Jatan - Respondent
Decided On : 29-03-1923
JUDGMENT
Ryves, J. - I agree with the reasons given by the learned Sessions Judge and quash the commitment to Sessions. I send the case back to the District Magistrate of Gorakhpur, who will depute a Magistrate competent to try it other than Mr. Bhadkamkar. Let the papers be returned.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
