SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(All) 126

YOUNG
Mahmud Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Young, J. - This is an application in revision from the decision of the learned Sessions Judge of Farrukhabad. The applicant, Mahmud Ali Khan was charged under Sections 60(a)(b) and (f) of the Excirse Act, Section 9(c) of the Opium Act, Section 19 of the Arms Act and Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code before a Magistrate of the first class. He was found guilty by the learned Magistrate and sentenced to one year's R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500 u/s 60(a) of the Excise Act and one year's R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500 under Sections 60(b) and (f) of the same Act. u/s 9(c) of the Opium Act he was sentenced to one year's" R.I. and a fine of Rs. 100. u/s 19 of the Arms, Act he was sentenced to one year's R.I. u/s 332 I.P.C. he was sentenced to four months' R.I, the sentences to run consecutively, making a total in all of four years and 4 months' R.I., and the fines amounted in all to Rs. 1,100.

2. The police by Farrukhabad obtained information that Mahmud Ali Khan was manufacturing in his house on the outskirts of Farrukhabad illicit liquor. The Deputy Superintendent of Police and the Joint Magistrate conducted a raid upon the house of Mahmud Ali Khan. They went there in the morning at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top