SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(All) 161

BENNET
Rama Kant Malaviya – Appellant
Versus
Satya Narain Malaviya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bennet, Ag. C.J.

1. This is a second appeal brought by two persons, Pt. Rama Kant Malaviya, Advocate, and Pt. Krishna Deo Chaube against a decree of the lower Appellate Court in a proceeding u/s 144, Civil P.C., for restitution. The matter in which this proceeding arose is as follows. The opposite party respondent, Pt. Satya Narain Malaviya, brought a suit for damages for defamation against 12 persons including the two appellants before us and the proceedings which followed were as follows:

7-11-27 - Decree for damages. Rs. 300 for defamation and Rs. 72 costs against twelve persons.

7-12-27 - Ten of these persons including appellants appealed and two persons Mahadeo Vyas and Thakur Prasad did not appeal.

13-1-28 - Application by plaintiff for execution against defendant 2, Brij Mohan Dube; defendants, Pt. Krishna Deo Chaube, appellant; defendant 4, Bechu Ram, and defendant 9 Parsotam Dube. This actual application is not against Pt. Rama Kant.

23-1-28 - An application to the Court for the full decretal amount of Rs. 373-13-3 to be deposited. The application is in the singular but the name written across below the application is "Ramakant waghairah madynunan". At the same time the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top