SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(All) 15

IQBAL AHMAD
Sat Deo Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Debi Badal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Iqbal Ahmad, J. - This is an appeal by Sat Deo Prasad, minor, an unsuccessful plaintiff, whose suit for a declaration that the compromise decree in suit No. 233 of 1933 of the Court of the Munsif, West Allahabad, was conclusive and void and was not binding on him (the plaintiff) has been dismissed by both the Courts below. The parties to the present suit are descended from one Bhagwan Prasad and their family pedigree is as follows:

                BHAGWAN PRASAD                      |            Debi Badal, defendant 1. _______________________|__________________ |                      |                  |Mathura Prasad   Dwarka Prasad,         Mahadeo   =              defendant 3.          Prasad,Inder Koer,                         defendant 2.   widow,                            |defendant 4.               Sat  Deo, plaintiff.

2. It appears that suit No. 233 of 1933 was filed on behalf of Sat Deo Prasad by his mother, Mt. Bhagwati Devi, who acted as his next friend in the suit. The defendants to that suit were amongst others Debi Badal, Dwarka Prasad and Inder Kuer. As Mt. Bhagwati Devi was a pardanashin lady she appointed one Balgobind as an attorney to look after the prose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top