SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1930 Supreme(All) 188

SEN
Data Din – Appellant
Versus
Mt. Nohra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sen, J. - This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration of title to certain zamindari property and for possession in the alternative. The relationship of the parties will appear from the following genealogical table;

                    Baijnath              ________|_________              |                 |           Ram Autar        Suraj Bali                                |   |               |            |Data Din       Sat Narain       |plaintiff 2    plaintiff 1    Ram Sanmukh                              =Mt. Nohra                               (defendant)

2. Data Din and Sat Narain claimed to be the members of a joint Hindu family with Ram Sanmukh, husband of Mt. Nohra defendant. They alleged that Ram Sanmukh died in the year 1918 as a member of the joint Hindu family and that they became owners of the property which was recorded in his name by right of survivorship and that the name of Mt. Nohra was recorded in the revenue papers only by way of solatii cause.

3. The suit was resisted on the ground that Ram Sanmukh died as a member of a divided family, that upon his death his property devolved upon his widow by right of inheritance, and that the suit w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top