SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(All) 53

DAR, GANGA NATH, IQBAL AHMAD
Chander – Appellant
Versus
Manohalal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.R. Avasthis, For the Appellant / Ram Nama Prasad for Respondents, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Iqbal Ahmad, C.J. - This is an appeal by Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram Plaintiffs arising out of a suit for a declaration that the house in dispute was liable to attachment and sale in execution of a decree for costs obtained by them in suit No. 36 of 192. Three persons were arrayed as Defendants in the present litigation. Manohar Lal was Defendant No 1 and his two minor sons Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta were Defendants 2 and 3.

2. Suit No. 36 of 1928, was brought by Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta minors against Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram for recovery of a certain amount of money; Manohar Lal acted as next friend of Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta in that suit. That suit was based on the allegation that Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta had advanced by way of loan the amount claimed to Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram. Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram, however, pleaded that the amount in suit was not advanced to them by way of loan but was, as a matter of fact, deposited with them by Manohar Lal as his (Manohar Lal's) contribution to the funds of a particular partnership in which Manohar Lal had entered with them (Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram)

3. The trial Court decreed suit No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top