DAR, GANGA NATH, IQBAL AHMAD
Chander – Appellant
Versus
Manohalal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Iqbal Ahmad, C.J. - This is an appeal by Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram Plaintiffs arising out of a suit for a declaration that the house in dispute was liable to attachment and sale in execution of a decree for costs obtained by them in suit No. 36 of 192. Three persons were arrayed as Defendants in the present litigation. Manohar Lal was Defendant No 1 and his two minor sons Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta were Defendants 2 and 3.
2. Suit No. 36 of 1928, was brought by Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta minors against Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram for recovery of a certain amount of money; Manohar Lal acted as next friend of Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta in that suit. That suit was based on the allegation that Ganesh Datta and Chandra Datta had advanced by way of loan the amount claimed to Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram. Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram, however, pleaded that the amount in suit was not advanced to them by way of loan but was, as a matter of fact, deposited with them by Manohar Lal as his (Manohar Lal's) contribution to the funds of a particular partnership in which Manohar Lal had entered with them (Chandra Shekhar and Balak Ram)
3. The trial Court decreed suit No.
Kamta Prasad Vs. Indomati and Another
Minakshi Aiyar by next friends Vs. Noor Muhammad Rowther and Others
M.P.P.S.T. Palaniappa Chetty and Others Vs. S.N. Subramania Chettiar and Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.