SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1935 Supreme(All) 87

BENNET, NIAMATULLAH, SULAIMAN
Genda Lal – Appellant
Versus
Hazari Lal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sulaiman, C.J. - These are revisions from decrees of a Court of Small Causes in which a question of limitation is involved. They have been referred to this Bench as there has been some apparent conflict on the question as to how far the principle of res judicata or estoppel by judgment applies to execution proceedings. A money decree was passed on 12th March 1928, and more than three years after that date, namely on 29th November 1932, the decree-holders filed an application in Court certifying the receipt of Rs. 50 on 11th November 1930. No notice of this was, of course, sent to the judgment-debtor, and the certificate was noted. On the 15th February 1933, the first application for execution was filed, and it was stated in the application that Rs. 50 had been received on 11th November 1930; and there was a further allegation that the judgment-debtor had given a slip, which was lost. The decree-holder prayed for the issue of a warrant of arrest. On 16th February 1933 the office reported that the application was in time. Accordingly a notice, possibly under Order 21, Rule 22, Civil P.C., was issued, fixing 6th March 1933. On receipt of a report that the judgment-debtor had r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top