DALAL
Banarsi Das – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dalal, J. - This application must succeed on both the grounds raised on behalf of the applicant. The applicant has been convicted of an offence u/s 4, United Provinces Prevention of Adulteration Act 6 of 1912(Local). There is a mandatory injunction in Section 15(2) of the Act that every summons issued in a prosecution u/s 4 and Section 10 shall specify particulars of the offence charged and the name of the prosecutor besides other information. In the summons no particulars were given; nor was the name of the prosecutor given. The particulars were essential in this case because even now I have not understood the exact reason or rather the exact charge on which the applicant has been convicted. If the particulars had been stated in the charge a Court of revision would have had an opportunity to test the particulars and discover whether they amounted to an offence u/s 4. What the learned Judge says I am afraid I am unable to understand. What happened in this case was that, according to the Magistrate, 21 canisters of ghee were found in a store-room of the applicant who sells ghee ordinarily as his business. The trial has been so perfunctory that I cannot discover whether every
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.