SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1896 Supreme(All) 131

BLAIR, KNOX
R. Wall – Appellant
Versus
J. E. Howard – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Knox and Blair, JJ. - This is a first appeal from an order passed by the District Judge of Allahabad. In the memorandum of appeal it is stated that the appeal is brought from an order dated the 30th of April 1894 and the 19th of May 1894. A memorandum of appeal can only deal with one particular order, but, as will be seen hereafter, part of the contention of the appellants is that the learned Judge gave an order of the 30th of April 1894 and completed that order on the 19th of May 1894. The proceeding before the Judge out of which the order appealed against arose consisted of an application praying the Judge to grant in inquiry u/s 163 and Section 214 of the Indian Companies Act, 1882. Both the orders mentioned in the memorandum of appeal were as a fact passed upon the proceeding which arose out of that application. On the 30th of April, the Judge dismissed the application so far as any inquiry u/s 214 of the Act was concerned. On the 19th of May he dismissed the application so far as it related to an inquiry u/s 162 of the same Act. A third paper over and above the copies of the orders of the above mentioned dates is attached to the memorandum of appeal. It is a paper abou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top