SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1932 Supreme(All) 353

C. J, SULAIMAN
Puran Mal – Appellant
Versus
Shiva Lal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sulaiman, C.J. - This is a plaintiffs appeal under the Letters Patent from a judgment of a learned Judge of this Court reversing the decree of the lower appellate Court.

2. It appears that one Inayat Khan and his three brothers were entitled to 5/6 share in a village, the remaining 1/6th belonged to a lady. Instead of mortgaging his 1/4 out of the 5/6, Inayat Khan made a mortgage of 1/4 share in the village to the present plaintiffs. This came to about 17 bighas odd and the remaining 1/4 of 1/6 came to about 2 bighas. Subsequently a sale-deed was taken from the lady in the names of the sons of Inayat Khan and their wives whose names were entered in the revenue papers. The defendants, in execution of a money decree against the sons and their wives, got 1/4 of 1/6 share belonging to the lady attached and put up for sale, and they purchased it themselves. Now, the plaintiffs have brought this suit for sale, on the basis of their mortgage-deed and wish to enforce the security against the extra share, namely, 1/4 of 1/6 which had been included in the mortgage, but which at that time did not belong to Inayat Khan. In the plaint there was no reference to Section 43, T.P. Act, and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top