SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1909 Supreme(All) 306

Mata Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Chandradeo Singh and Sheo Babu Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

John Stanley, Kt., C.J. - This second appeal was directed to be laid before a Full Bench in consequence of a conflict in the decisions of this and the other High Courts upon the man question involved in it. The suit is one to enforce payment of a mortgage by sale of the mortgaged property. The mortgage was executed by the late Ram Narain Singh, who was the head of the defendants family on the 4th of September 1883 to secure a principal sum of Rs. 400 in favour of Ram Narain Kalwar, the father of the plaintiff respondent Sheo Babu Singh and the grandfather of the appellant Chanderdeo Singh. The parties are governed by the law of the Mitakshara. It was found by the Court of first instance that the mortgage was not executed for the purpose of satisfying any antecedent debt and there was no evidence that the consideration was required for the legal necessities of the family, or that the lender made any inquiry as to the purposes for which the money was borrowed. On the other hand it was not proved, or even alleged, that the debt was tainted with immorality. On these findings the court mainly relying on the decision in the case of Debi Dat Vs. Jadu Rai and Others, (1902) ILR (Al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top