SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1932 Supreme(All) 303

MUKERJI
B. Brij Gopal – Appellant
Versus
B. Suraj Karan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukerji, J. - This is the plaintiff's appeal and is directed against an order rejecting his plaint. The suit, out of which this appeal has arisen, was instituted to obtain a declaration that the entire family property in the hands of the plaintiff, as the head of a joint family belonged equally to the plaintiff and the male defendant, defendant 1, and that certain documents executed by certain deceased members of the family did not affect the jointness of the family.

2. When the suit was filed, the Munsarim reported that the relief called for payment of an additional court-fee of Rs. 10, as, in the opinion of the Munsarim, there were two declarations involved in the relief. Thereupon the plaintiff got the relief amended, and the Court decided that the court-fee paid, namely, Rs. 10, was sufficient.

3. Defendant 1 in his written statement, filed on 17th July 1928, took the plea that the court-fee paid was insufficient. He did not ask that the question of court-fee should be tried as a preliminary issue. Before any issues could be framed, in the case, the Munsarim made a second report on 4th September 1919 and stated that in view of a decision contained in Arunachalam Chetty v.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top