SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(All) 339

COLLISTER
Nepal Rai – Appellant
Versus
Paras Ram Dube – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Collister, J. - This is a defendants' appeal which arises out of a suit to recover possession of five plots, Nos. 201, 285, 365, 289 and 346/2, in village Ghhapra Mansur in the District of Gorakhpur. The case for the plaintiffs, as set out in the plaint, may be briefly stated as follows:

On 17th October 1911, a co-sharer named Kamta, who owned 19 pies in khata khewat No. 2, executed a usufructuary mortgage in respect of the plots in suit and other plots in favour of defendants 1 and 2 and the father of defendant 3. On 25th April 1928, Lalsa, the son of Kamta who by that time had died, sold the five plots in suit along with other plots to plaintiffs. 1 and 2 and the father of the remaining plaintiff's, leaving with the vendees the money required to pay off the mortgage-deed of 17th October 1911. The plaintiffs duly deposited this money in Court in favour of the defendants in accordance with the provisions of Section 83, T.P. Act; but the defendants refused to deliver possession of the plots in suit. The defendants pleaded inter alia that on 23rd December 1921, they had purchased a five pie share in khata khewat No. 2 from Kamta and his son, Lalsa, and that they thus acquired

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top