ALLSOP, BAJPAI, COLLISTER, DAR, IQBAL AHMAD, MOHD. ISMAIL, VERMA
Ram Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Iqbal Ahmad, C. J.
1. I agree with my brothers Allsop, Ismail and Dar that the mortgage made by Balkaran Singh in 1927 was valid and that both the appeals must fail. That there is considerable and almost alarming conflict of judicial opinion on the questions of law that arise for decision in the present appeals admits of no doubt and, accordingly, the principle of stare decisis cannot be invoked in the decision of these appeals. The relevant case law has been noticed in detail in his judgment by my brother Dar and I, therefore, refrain from entering into a discussion of those cases. It is, however, manifest that the divergence of judicial opinion in this province on the questions involved has led to considerable confusion, and it is about time that the Legislature should step in and prevent that confusion from becoming worse confounded. My reasons for arriving at the conclusion indicated above are briefly as follows :
The right of transfer is a fundamental incident attaching to every description of proprietary right unless such right is barred by any express or implied provision of law. The Transfer of Property Act (4 of 1882) codifies the law of transfer applicable to Britis
Qutubuddin Vs. Mangala Dubey and Another
Mohammad Sher Khan and Others Vs. Bharat Indu and Others
Jadunath Singh Vs. Hanuman Singh and Others
Kashi Nath Tewari and Another Vs. Makchhed Tewari and Others
Mt. Lachhmina Kunwari Vs. Mt. Makfula Kunwari and Others
Haldhar Upadhya Vs. Ram Sumer Upadhya and Another
Abu Jafar Vs. Syed Mohammad Kazim
Chanar Singh Jai Ram Vs. Chanar Singh Jeet Singh
Jhillar Rai and Others Vs. Rajnarain Rai and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.