Back
RAVI S. DHAVAN
Lt. Col. Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Chandra, Secretary, Ministry of Defence – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravi S. Dhavan, J. - On May 19, 1992 this Court notices that innumerable adjournments had been occasioned in this case, and ordered that the matter be listed during the first week of July for fixing the date for hearing. The matter was listed on July, 7, 1992, but adjourned to the next day again due to non-availability of counsel. On July 9, 1992 the Court passed an order that the matter should be listed for hearing on July, 24, 1992 and that the opposite parties shall be present on the day of hearing. The matter was listed for July, 24, 1992. The opposite parties were not present on that date. The proceedings record that learned Counsel for the parties submitted that the date had escaped their notice, and, they did not intimate their respective clients of the date of hearing. The submissions of learned Counsel made in concert may be a coincidence too good to be granted as taken, but as counsel had made and taken upon themselves this matter of date avoidance, the Court accepted their responsibility. The case was adjourned and fixed for hearing on the date sought and as indicated to the Court i. e. August 18, 1992. This Court is not going into the question of counsel of all
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
