SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 913

B. L. YADAV
Basher Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.N. Singh and S.N. Singh, for the Appellant; K.M. Dayal and S.C., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

B.L. Yadav, J. - This petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 14.08.1974 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in a revision u/s 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (for short the Act). The plot in dispute was 616 area 10 bight 1 beeswax and Basher Ahmad, Petitioner No. 1 was recorded as Sridhar over a portion of the same in the basic year.

2. An objection u/s 9A(2) of the Act was filed by Respondent No. 3 to 7 alleging that they were vendees from the Hussein Medic and the sale deed was executed in 1935 and after the date of vesting they became Chemiphar and may be entered as such in the revenue papers. The Petitioners on the other hand contested the case of the Respondents alleging that the sale deed of 1935 was never given effect to in the revenue papers and that the vendor Hussein Medic has no right to execute the sale deed with respect to Mohall Sharifunnisa in which the disputed plot was situated.

3. The Consolidation Officer decided the case in favor of the Petitioners by his order dated 24.04.73. The appeal of the contesting Respondents was dismissed by order dated 02.11.73 whereas the revision has b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top