Back
K. C. AGARWAL, K. M. DAYAL
Kedar Lal Verma – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Board of High School and Intermediate Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.C. Agarwal, J. - Sri Kedar Lal Verma, the petitioner appeared at the High School Examination of the U. P. Board of High School and Intermediate Education, Allahabad held in the year 1977. The petitioner obtained the marks-sheet from the Government Intermediate College, Peepalkot, District Pithauragarh. In the said marks sheet the marks secured by the petitioner in the various subjects offered by him were as under:--
| fo"k;ksa ds uke | izFke iz'u i= | f}rh; iz'u i= | r`rh; iz'u i= | ;ksx | iz;ksxkRed | ;ksx | iw.kkd | |
| 1- | fgUnh | 17 | 12 | 19 | 48 | 100 | ||
| 2- | xf.kr | 31 | 11 | 42 | 100 | |||
| 3- | foKku | 08 | 11 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 100 | |
| 4- | dks"kfoKku | 09 | 15 | 24 | 10 | 34 | 100 | |
| 5- | vUxzsth | 20 | 17 | 37 | 100 | |||
| lEiw.kZ ;ksx vadks rFkk 'kCnksa esa 120@500 ,d lkS ckuos ek= | ||||||||
ijh{kk Qy vuqrh.kZ
It is common case of the parties that on the marks secured, the petitioner could not be declared passed the High School Examination, But as against the column meant for being notified as pass or fail, the marks-sheet given to him mentioned that he had passed the examination. On the basis of the aforesaid marks-sheet, the petitioner claimed that he got himself admitted in the Intermediate in the Government Intermediate College, Luck-now. As the original marks-sheet, the petitioner claimed to h
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
