JUDGMENT

K.N. Misra, J. - This writ petition arises out of orders passed by the consolidation authorities in proceedings relating to allotment of chaks. The petitioner Doodh Nath is Chak holder No. 88. His two sons: Mahabir Prasad and Mahesh Prasad are separate chak holders Nos. 153 and 154 respectively. As against the proposed allotment of chak petitioner Doodh Nath had filed objection asserting that he has got his tube well. He further asserted that the chak which has been allotted to the petitioner at plot Nos. 469 etc. is unfertile and has been valued at a higher exchange ratio. The petitioner had also contended that the chak which has been allotted to him on the other side of the canal cannot be irrigated by the tube well situate on plot No. 591. He therefore, asserted that a chak be allotted to him near his tube well in Sector No. 15 and the chak allotted to him on plot No. 469 be abolished. Tae objection filed by the petitioner was contested by the opposite party No. 4 Ambika Prasad and he asserted that the petitioner's aforesaid two sons have been allotted land in Sector No. 11 and 16 near the said tube well. It was further asserted that the chaks allotted to the parties do