SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 730

U. C. SRIVASTAVA
Hanoman – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director of Consolidation, Faizabad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

U. C. Srivastava, J. - After losing the case before all consolidation authorities the petitioners have filed this writ petition. So far as petitioners are concerned the dispute is confined to Khata No. 204 of the village in question which includes few plots. Earlier there was some dispute regarding pedigree as the pedigree set up by the petitioners was disputed and their predecessor Shiv Bhik who was not admitted to be brother of Shiv Dayal, i. e., predecessor of opposite parties, but later on it appears that it was admitted before the Settlement Officer, Consolidation, that is why there is no dispute regarding pedigree. The following pedigree will be relevant :

Pratit

Shiv Dayal urf Dadaji

Gur Prasad

Gajadhar

Prahlad

Bhagwan Dass

Ram Dass

Orauni (disputed)

Gurdin Bewa Umrai

Shiv Bhikh

Barsati

Ram Mohan

Ram Saran

Girdhari

Dhoom

Hanoman

2. The petitioners filed objections claiming cotenancy rights over the Khata in dispute as the same was acquired from the time of common ancestor and the parties were in joint possession of the same and, in the alternative, sirdari rights over few plots were claimed.

3. The matter came before the Consolidations Officer before whom parties tendered oral and doc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top