M. KATJU
Jagdish Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Passenger Tax officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M. Katjo, J. - The Petitioner is an owner of four buses registered as contract carriages with the Regional Transport Authority, Mathura. The Petitioner entered into a contract with Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. A true copy of the agreement is Annexure 1 to the writ petition. Under this contract the Petitioner has placed its vehicles at the disposal of the Corporation for carrying the employees of the Corporation from their residences to the office of the Corporation. The Petitioner is paid charges not according to the number of passengers but according to the kilometers covered by the vehicle. In lieu of rendering such services the Petitioner is paid an amount as provided in Article 3.1 of the Contract (page of the writ petition).
2. By means of this petition, the Petitioner is challenging the levy of passenger tax under the U.P. Motor Gadi (Yatri-Kar) Adhiniyam, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam). In para 11 of the writ petition it is alleged that if a vehicle is run by a person exclusively in connection with his trade or business without any hire or reward from the passengers, the incidence of taxation under the Adhiniyam would not be attracted. In para 13 of th
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Orissa and others
India Cement Ltd. and Others Vs. State Of Tamil Nadu and Others
The State of Madras Vs. Gannon Dunkerley and Co., (Madras) Ltd.
Sudhir Chandra Nawn Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, Calcutta and Others
A.S. Karthikeyan and Others Vs. State of Kerala and Another
Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.