SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 896

D. S. SINHA, S. K. DHAON
Hari Shankar Asopa – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sudhir Agarwal, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Standing Counsel, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

D. S. Sinha, J. - Hari Shanker Asopa. a retired Professor of Surgery, belonging to the services of State Medical College in the State of Uttar Pradesh, has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ, orderor direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the State of U.P. through Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Shasan, Medical and Health Department, Lucknow and the Director of Medical Health and Family Welfare, U.P. Lucknow, arrayed as respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in the petition, to pay him pension and other retirement benefits with effect from the date of his voluntary retirement i.e. 21st Feb., 1983 and also to consider his case for confirmation on the various posts, upon which, he had worked in the Department of Surgery while in service and to confirm him with due date as has been done in the case of other teachers vide Government Order dated 11th Feb., 1985.

2. The uncontroverted facts, as they emerge from the pleadings contained in the petition, are these:

Consequent upon his selection by the U.P. Public Service Commission for the post of Lecturer in Experimental and Clinical Surgery in the services of State Medical Colle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top