SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 725

K. P. SINGH, R. M. SAHAI
Shailendra Nath Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Vice-Chancellor, Allahabad University – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner

ORDER

Sahai, J. - Daily Wagers of Allahabad University Working continuously for last five years without any break, mainly in its Library section, have invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court against termination of their services by the Librarian as invalid and void since they, having worked for more than 240 days became regular employees whose services could not be dispensed with except in accordance with procedure provided under Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. In the initial stages of arguments attempt was made to dispute applicability of the Act to University but later on it was given up. therefore, controversy narrowed down to if termination of petitioners' services did not amount to retrenchment within meaning of Cl. (oo) of Section 2 of the Act as it had come to an end because of expiry of term of contract entered between University. the employers and petitioners, the employees, as provided in sub-cl. (bb) of Cl. (oo) added in 1984.

3. That termination of service of a workman who has worked for not less than 240 days within a period of 12 months immediately preceding the date of termination without paying retrenchment compensation or fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top