Back
S. D. AGARWALA
Ved Prakash Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
IIIrd Addl. District Judge. Bulandshahr – Respondent
ORDER
S.D. Agarwala, J. - This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arising out of proceedings under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The petitioner is the landlord, respondent No. 3 is the tenant. The property in dispute is a shop situate in Bulandshahr.
2. The petitioner filed an application under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Act on the ground that he was due to retire on 30th June. 1978 and thereafter it would become necessary for him to engage himself in some business to earn his livelihood. The applicant did not want to depend upon his three sons who are all employed. It was alleged that he wanted to start Crockery business. The application was contested by the respondent No. 3. The Prescribed Authority held that the requirement of the petitioner was not bona fide and genuine. It was further found that greater hardship would be caused to the tenant from the grant of the application than to the landlord in case the application is rejected. On this finding, the Prescribed Authority dismissed the application on 29th September, 1978. Against the said judgment
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
