SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 766

A. P. MISRA, V. K. MEHROTRA
Anand Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
in Person, for the Petitioner; Standing Counsel, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

A.P. Misra, J. - The petitioner of this writ petition has sought for a writ of mandamus against the respondents to ban all strikes undertaken by the various units of the State Government as it affects the interest of the public at large. He has also sought for quashing the decision by the respondent No. 6 namely. Sri Lok Pati Tripathi. Health Minister. U.P.. which is stated to be incorporated in Annexure 8 to the writ petition. He has further sought for necessary action against the concerned respondents for the failure of their duties towards the Constitution and public welfare.

2. The petitioner in this case has argued in person. He has described himself in the petition as a social worker, humanist and a social reformer. He has further stated in the petition that he is devoted and dedicated to the maintenance of peace, progress. prosperity, pleasure. parity, justice and discipline. In this petition, the petitioner has expressed his grievance against the Government for its inaction in various fields, which has led to gross indiscipline, disobedience, lawlessness and corruption in the Cour)try. His main contention in the petition is that because of strikes by various constit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top