SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 1114

K. P. SINGH
Achutanand – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi – Respondent


ORDER

K.P. Singh, J. - This writ petition is directed against the judgment of the Kshetriya Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi dated 31-5-1972 whereby the revision petition filed by the contesting opposite party No. 4 Ram Lakshman Pandey was allowed. The relationship between the contesting parties would be evident from the following pedigree :-(For Pedigree see next page)

2. The petitioners had filed an objection under Section 9-A sub-clause (2) of U. P. C. H. Act basing their claim on a registered will dated 6-5-1965 executed by their grand-father Harbansh Pandey in respect of 11 Bighas, 12 Biswas and 15 Dhoors. The claim of the petitioners was accepted by the Consolidation Officer through his judgment dated 28-7-1971. Aggrieved by the decision of the Consolidation Officer the contesting opposite party Ram Lakshman Pandey had filed an appeal which was dismissed by the appellate authority through its judgment dated 12-11-1971. Thereafter the contesting opposite party had preferred a revision petition which was allowed through the impugned judgment dated 31-5-1972 of the revisional court. The petitioners being aggrieved by the judgment of the revisional court have come to thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top