Back
K. P. SINGH
Sheo Parsan – Appellant
Versus
District Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.P. Singh, J.- By means of this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the judgment of Sri D.D. Lal, District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Banda dated 21.2.1984.
2. The main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioners before me is that the revisional court has disregarded the directions of this court contained in Annexure "4" attached with the writ petition.
3. The Second contention on behalf of the petitioners is that the revisional court has reviewed the order dated 11.6.1976 whereby the claim of the petitioners had been accepted and the contention of the petitioners regarding valuation had been confirmed even by this Court, hence the impugned order deserves to be quashed.
4. The learned counsel for contesting opposite parties has submitted in reply that the revision petitions are to be heard on merits, hence the impugned order need not be interfered, with. He has also submitted that the petitioners shall get full opportunity to address the revisional court on merits of their revision petitions, hence the impugned order should not be interfered. According to the learned counsel for the contesting opposite parties the question of valuation regarding t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
