SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 882

A. H. KHAN
Ram Sunder – Appellant
Versus
Gaon Sabha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.N. Mishra, Advocate Lucknow, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

A.H. Khan, Member (Judicial). - This reference has been made by Sri Sita Ram Pandey, learned Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Faizabad Division, Faizabad, who by his order dated September 9, 1987 has recommended that the order of Sri Vinod Kumar Srivastava, Chief Revenue Officer, Sultanpur, dated March 9, 1987 be set aside, and application of Ram Sunder for correction of area shown in the map be corrected.

2. The facts of the case arc that Ram Kuber and Ram Sunder have made an application under Section 28 of U.P.L.R. Act before Collector, Sultanpur, on 3-10-1985. They have set out the case that applicant and Jag Narayan were previously bhumidhars of Khasra No. 259/2, area 3 biswa 5 dhurs, that on the death of Jag Narayan, his sons Ram Boh and applicants came in possession, and that from previous no. 259/2, new numbers 259 and 269 were constituted. Further, no. 261, area 2 biswa 5 dhurs was included in applicants chak, plot no. 259 was included in the chak of opposite party, Devi Prasad. Similarly, plot no. 260 was included as property of Goan Sabha. He states that the map of the plots is not correctly made and his area of 2 Biswa and 5 dhurs is shown only as 1 biswa 8 dh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top