SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Indu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Counsel for Applicant :- Juned Alam
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Samit Gopal, J.

1. List revised.

2. Heard Sri Juned Alam, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.

3. The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Indu Devi, seeking anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest during trial in Special Session No. 73 of 2019, arising out of Case Crime No. 279 of 2016, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, Police Station Barhaj, District Deoria during trial.

4. Prior notice of this anticipatory bail application was served in the office of the learned Government Advocate, High Court, Allahabad and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020 - Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P. this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned State counsel as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required since learned counsel for the State informs the Court that he has received the required instructions in the matter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top