SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2174

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
Kamlesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Hari Narayan Singh,Punya Sheel Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

(Chandra Dhari Singh, J.)

1. The applicant through his brother Ram Balesh Yadav has preferred the instant bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C seeking regular bail in Case Crime No. 112 of 2023, under Section 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station – Aims, District – Gorakhpur.

Brief Facts

2. The briefly stated basic facts of the application are as under:

(i) The applicant has been in jail since 28.7.2023. The first informant Pushpa Prajapati lodged a first information report (for short ‘FIR’) on 7.9.2025 at 6:07 PM against the applicant and another person namely Ajay Sharma, was registered as Case Crime No. 112 of 2023, under Section 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station – Aims, District – Gorakhpur.

(ii) It is alleged in the FIR that the applicant is a property dealer and in lieu of providing land of Gata No. 112 situated at village – Bahrampur, Tehsil – Chauri Chaura, District – Gorakhpur, he has taken an amount of Rs. 50,000/- and Rs. 2,00,000/- from complainant Pushpa Prajapati. At the time of execution of sale deed the first informant gave two cheques amounting to Rs. 7,00,000/- and Rs. 2,00,000/ in the name of “Vindhyavasini Trader

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top