G. S. AHLUWALIA
Prosecutrix – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This application under Section 439 (2) of Cr.P.C. has been filed for setting aside the order dated 28/8/2021 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gwalior in Bail Application No.2352/2021, by which the respondent no.2 has been granted bail.
2. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that while granting bail, the Court below must apply its mind to the facts of the case. The gravity of the offence is also to be considered. However, without applying any mind and without assigning any reason, the Court below has granted bail to the respondent no.2. It is submitted that according to the prosecution case, the prosecutrix is minor and is a student of Class 10th and from the month of September, 2020 the applicant was visiting her house for teaching her. For the first two months the respondent no.2 taught the prosecutrix properly, but thereafter, he started misbehaving with her. It is submitted that the respondent no.2 used to touch the private parts of the prosecutrix and in the absence of the mother of the prosecutrix, he used to commit rape on her. On 29/3/2021 at about 1-3 PM when the mother of the prosecutrix was not in the house and by threatening the handicapped bro
D.K. Ganesh Babu vs. P. T. Manokaran
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565 : 1980 SCC (Cri) 561
Jai Prakash Singh vs. State of Bihar
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan
Kanwar Singh Meena vs. State of Rajasthan
Mahipal vs. Rajesh Kumar alias Polia and another
Myakala Dharmarajam vs. State of Telangana
Pokar Ram vs. State of Rajasthan
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra vs. Mohd. Sajid Husain Mohd. S. Husain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.