Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, DONADI RAMESH
Mujahid Beg – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment process of vice-chancellor governed by university act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. statutory provisions detail roles in vice-chancellor's appointment. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 3. petitioners argue bias and manipulation in appointment process. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. court examines bias and procedural integrity in appointments. (Para 30 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. differentiation between selection and election in appointments. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. voting process in selection does not equate to election. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 7. allegations of vote manipulation deemed unfounded. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 8. bias principles applicable in selection processes. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 9. procedural fairness questioned due to familial ties. (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 10. visitor's discretion in appointments is paramount. (Para 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84) |
| 11. limited role of executive council in appointment process. (Para 85 , 86 , 87 , 88) |
| 12. first woman vice-chancellor's |
The appointment of a Vice-Chancellor must adhere to statutory procedures; claims of bias must be substantiated, and the Visitor's discretion in appointments is paramount.
The court upheld that the appointment process followed statutory provisions, and the involvement of the Minister did not invalidate the appointment, establishing judicial review limits in administrat....
The court held that the SCS Committee was properly constituted in accordance with the provisions of the JMI Act and the UGC Regulations, that the members of the SCS Committee were persons of eminence....
The appointment of a university Vice-Chancellor must comply with statutory requirements for unanimous consent from the Board as stipulated by law.
The constitution of a selection committee must ensure experts possess relevant subject knowledge, and any perceived bias or procedural irregularities in their formation can invalidate the entire sele....
The decision-making process must adhere to established norms and be free from bias and favoritism.
The appointment of Vice-Chancellors must comply with statutory provisions and UGC regulations, ensuring lawful and independent decision-making by the Chancellor.
The reconstitution of a Selection Committee during an ongoing interview process is illegal and arbitrary, necessitating a fresh selection process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
